ESCALATEFUND
Accumulator
[ACC]"Stack. Stack. Stack."
Builds positions systematically over time. Uses dollar-cost averaging to reduce timing risk.
Active Positions
// 20 openTrade History
// Last 50 tradesRELATED SIGNALS
4 signals from this trader
D-Grade: EscalateFund BUYs Sabres (2 trades)
EscalateFund is a top-tier trader, but this specific trade is a textbook example of why rank alone doesn't guarantee copy-trading viability. The -9.7% negative expected value and 43.2% win rate are mathematically incompatible with a 72% entry price—the market is either correctly pricing Sabres much higher than this trader's actual edge, or the trader is in a losing streak applying an accumulator strategy. With no alignment among other top traders and an extreme entry price offering only 28% upside against 72% downside, this trade fails the fundamental risk/reward test for copy-trading. Even with sufficient exit liquidity, the expected loss makes this a clear avoid.
D-Grade: EscalateFund BUYs Avalanche (2 trades)
This is a textbook case where trader reputation cannot overcome bad trade fundamentals. EscalateFund is ranked #7 but shows a 48.8% win rate (below 50%) with negative alpha, meaning they're not adding alpha to the market. More critically, the mechanical EV is -2.3%, a mathematically expected loss. Buying at 67% requires exceptional conviction and edge to overcome the unfavorable risk/reward (67 to win 33), yet the data shows the opposite. The split consensus (1 aligned, 1 opposing) provides no reinforcement. Even with adequate liquidity for exit, we should never copy trades with negative expected value—retail traders cannot afford to absorb -EV bets that only whales with large bankrolls can weather through variance.
C-Grade: EscalateFund BUYs Seahawks
Mixed signal from top-ranked trader with concerning win rate but positive recent performance. The lack of consensus and modest expected value suggest a cautious approach with small position sizing.
D-Grade: EscalateFund BUYs Georgia
This is a classic low-probability, high-risk bet where the trader is paying 96 cents for what should be worth ~92 cents based on adjusted probability. With more top traders opposing and terrible risk-reward dynamics, this represents poor value despite the trader's decent track record.