RDBA
Accumulator
[ACC]"Stack. Stack. Stack."
Builds positions systematically over time. Uses dollar-cost averaging to reduce timing risk.
Active Positions
// 20 openRELATED SIGNALS
4 signals from this trader
Value Entry: rdba $22,917 total
14 tracked whale(s) show weak SPLIT consensus (57%). Bayesian analysis suggests 2% lower true probability.
Value Entry: rdba $132,817.13 total
3 tracked whale(s) show strong YES consensus (100%). Bayesian analysis suggests 3% higher true probability.
Value Entry: rdba $73,500 total
2 tracked whale(s) show weak SPLIT consensus (50%). Bayesian analysis suggests 1% lower true probability.
D-Grade: rdba BUYs Yes (81 trades)
This is a textbook example of why copying trades at extreme price zones fails for retail users, regardless of market liquidity. The whale is betting at 94.9% that 'another person/thing' wins TIME's Person of the Year—a statement so probabilistically extreme that it leaves almost no margin for error. With only 5.1% max upside against 94.9% max downside, the risk/reward is inverted relative to a copy-trader's needs. The trader (rank #50, 51.6% win rate) has no demonstrated edge strong enough to justify such conviction, and smart-money disagreement (2 opposing whales) suggests even experienced traders are skeptical. This is NOT a liquidity problem (exit is viable)—it's a math problem. Following unproven traders into tail probabilities is how retail copy-traders destroy capital.